Review: Limonov


 

Limonov
Limonov by Emmanuel Carrère
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

 

 

 

Îmi este atât de scârbă de această carte încât am decis că nici măcar o recenzie negativă nu merită pentru că ar fi tot un fel de reclamă.

Rugămintea/Mesajul/Îndemnul NU CUMPĂRA ACEASTĂ CARTE  stă în picioare.

View all my reviews

Anunțuri

4 gânduri despre „Review: Limonov

  1. Non, non et non .

    Edouard Limonov n’est pas un fasciste.

    Celui qui est un fasciste est celui qui veut bruler un livre, envoyer en prison des gens qui réfléchissent.

    Je suis un français libéral de gauche, anti-fasciste, et je pense que Edouard Limonov est un homme à la vie extraordinaire.
    Un héros des temps modernes . Un trés grand écrivain.

    Voici un site avec beaucoup d’informations nouvelles sur Edouard Limonov :
    http://www.tout-sur-limonov.fr/

    • Traducere română din mesajul meu scris în limba franceză (prin Google Translate) :

      Nu, nu și nu.
      Eduard Limonov nu este un fascist.
      Unul care este un fascist este oricine care vrea să ardă o carte, trimis la închisoare persoanele care reflectă.
      Sunt un stânga francez liberal, anti-fascist, și cred că Eduard Limonov este un om cu viață extraordinară.
      Un erou al timpurilor moderne. O foarte mare scriitor.
      Aici este un site cu o mulțime de noi informații cu privire la Eduard Limonov:
      http://www.tout-sur-limonov.fr/

    • You said that the fascists are the one who burn books and imprison the intellectuals. Well, Bolshevism didn’t burned books, but they did banned books ( the samizdat books – you know about them right? ) but how come you don’t know about the sending of the intellectuals in Gulag? You are telling me that this the main difference between fascism and communism? Well, there is no difference, dear Dominique, at least not if you know what both ideology did.

      I will not argue with you.
      I’ve read Carrere book and I’ve searched the internet for info about Limonov.
      Things are clear: he has imperialist and expansionist visions.
      As long as he made a party who defend Stalinism (which by the way he lost the control of it, after he feed his supporters with hate and aggression and chauvinism), no one in good mental health should support, publish or market persons like him.
      How, how in this years can someone agree with this kind of behavior!?!?
      How someone who support the politics of Stalin can be sustained by any sane person in this century?!?!?
      What’s next? The forgiveness and rehabilitation of Hitler? Well then, if democracy wouldn’t do anything against this kind of attitude and Stalin politics and views are supported and forwarded as political options in this century, than the Nazis should also rise and fight back because it seems like is the only option to shut down this filthy and unspeakable views!
      So, we will, finally, go back when the human nature was so ill and depraved enough to do mass killings of innocent people!
      The bolshevism is dead and it should be convicted and forbidden and banned as national-socialism is. There is no difference between this two ideologies. So, even if one survived because it won the war, it shouldn’t mean that in these day it should be accepted and it’s memory continued. If bolshevism is forgiven and accepted, the same treatment should be applied to the national-socialism also because there is no difference between them.

Lasă un răspuns

Completează mai jos detaliile tale sau dă clic pe un icon pentru a te autentifica:

Logo WordPress.com

Comentezi folosind contul tău WordPress.com. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Google+

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google+. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Conectare la %s